The idea of plugins and the SimulatorAccess and Introspection classes

The idea of plugins and the SimulatorAccess and Introspection classes#

The most common modification you will probably want to do to ASPECT are to switch to a different material model (i.e., have different values of functional dependencies for the coefficients \(\eta,\rho,C_p, \ldots\) discussed in Coefficients); change the geometry; change the direction and magnitude of the gravity vector \(\mathbf g\); or change the initial and boundary conditions.

To make this as simple as possible, all of these parts of the program (and some more) have been separated into what we call plugins that can be replaced quickly and where it is simple to add a new implementation and make it available to the rest of the program and the input parameter file. There are a lot of plugins already, see Fig. 240, that will often be useful starting points and examples if you want to implement plugins yourself.

The graph of all current plugins of ASPECT. The yellow octagon and square represent the [Simulator]( and [SimulatorAccess]( classes. The green boxes are interface classes for everything that can be changed by plugins. Blue circles correspond to plugins that implement particular behavior. The graph is of course too large to allow reading individual plugin names (unless you zoom far into the page), but is intended to illustrate the architecture of ASPECT.

Fig. 240 The graph of all current plugins of ASPECT. The yellow octagon and square represent the Simulator and SimulatorAccess classes. The green boxes are interface classes for everything that can be changed by plugins. Blue circles correspond to plugins that implement particular behavior. The graph is of course too large to allow reading individual plugin names (unless you zoom far into the page), but is intended to illustrate the architecture of ASPECT.#

The way this is achieved is through the following two steps:

  • The core of ASPECT really only communicates with material models, geometry descriptions, etc., through a simple and very basic interface. These interfaces are declared in the include/aspect/material_model/interface.h, [include/aspect/geometry_model/interface.h]( etc., header files. These classes are always called Interface, are located in namespaces that identify their purpose, and their documentation can be found from the general class overview in

    To show an example of a rather minimal case, here is the declaration of the aspect::GravityModel::Interface class (documentation comments have been removed):

    class Interface
            virtual ~Interface();
            gravity_vector (const Point<dim> &position) const = 0;
            static void declare_parameters (ParameterHandler &prm);
            virtual void parse_parameters (ParameterHandler &prm);

    If you want to implement a new model for gravity, you just need to write a class that derives from this base class and implements the gravity_vector function. If your model wants to read parameters from the input file, you also need to have functions called declare_parameters and parse_parameters in your class with the same signatures as the ones above. On the other hand, if the new model does not need any run-time parameters, you do not need to overload these functions.[1]

    Each of the categories above that allow plugins have several implementations of their respective interfaces that you can use to get an idea of how to implement a new model.

  • At the end of the file where you implement your new model, you need to have a call to the macro ASPECT_REGISTER_GRAVITY_MODEL (or the equivalent for the other kinds of plugins). For example, let us say that you had implemented a gravity model that takes actual gravimetric readings from the GRACE satellites into account, and had put everything that is necessary into a class aspect::GravityModel::GRACE. Then you need a statement like this at the bottom of the file:

         "A gravity model derived from GRACE "
         "data. Run-time parameters are read from the parameter "
         "file in subsection 'Radial constant'.");

    Here, the first argument to the macro is the name of the class. The second is the name by which this model can be selected in the parameter file. And the third one is a documentation string that describes the purpose of the class (see, for example, Gravity model for an example of how existing models describe themselves).

    This little piece of code ensures several things: (i) That the parameters this class declares are known when reading the parameter file. (ii) That you can select this model (by the name “grace”) via the run-time parameter Gravity model/Model name. (iii) That ASPECT can create an object of this kind when selected in the parameter file.

    Note that you need not announce the existence of this class in any other part of the code: Everything should just work automatically.[2] This has the advantage that things are neatly separated: You do not need to understand the core of ASPECT to be able to add a new gravity model that can then be selected in an input file. In fact, this is true for all of the plugins we have: by and large, they just receive some data from the simulator and do something with it (e.g., postprocessors), or they just provide information (e.g., initial meshes, gravity models), but their writing does not require that you have a fundamental understanding of what the core of the program does.

The procedure for the other areas where plugins are supported works essentially the same, with the obvious change in namespace for the interface class and macro name.

In the following, we will discuss the requirements for individual plugins. Before doing so, however, let us discuss ways in which plugins can query other information, in particular about the current state of the simulation. To this end, let us not consider those plugins that by and large just provide information without any context of the simulation, such as gravity models, prescribed boundary velocities, or initial temperatures. Rather, let us consider things like postprocessors that can compute things like boundary heat fluxes. Taking this as an example (see Postprocessors: Evaluating the solution after each time step), you are required to write a function with the following interface

template <int dim>
    class MyPostprocessor : public aspect::Postprocess::Interface
        execute (TableHandler &statistics);

      // ... more things ...

The idea is that in the implementation of the execute function you would compute whatever you are interested in (e.g., heat fluxes) and return this information in the statistics object that then gets written to a file (see Overview and Visualizing statistical data). A postprocessor may also generate other files if it so likes – e.g., graphical output, a file that stores the locations of particles, etc. To do so, obviously you need access to the current solution. This is stored in a vector somewhere in the core of ASPECT. However, this vector is, by itself, not sufficient: you also need to know the finite element space it is associated with, and for that the triangulation it is defined on. Furthermore, you may need to know what the current simulation time is. A variety of other pieces of information enters computations in these kinds of plugins.

All of this information is of course part of the core of ASPECT, as part of the aspect::Simulator class. However, this is a rather heavy class: it’s got dozens of member variables and functions, and it is the one that does all of the numerical heavy lifting. Furthermore, to access data in this class would require that you need to learn about the internals, the data structures, and the design of this class. It would be poor design if plugins had to access information from this core class directly. Rather, the way this works is that those plugin classes that wish to access information about the state of the simulation inherit from the aspect::SimulatorAccess class. This class has an interface that looks like this:

template <int dim>
    class SimulatorAccess
      double       get_time () const;

      std::string  get_output_directory () const;

      const LinearAlgebra::BlockVector &
      get_solution () const;

      const DoFHandler<dim> &
      get_dof_handler () const;

      // ... many more things ...

This way, SimulatorAccess makes information available to plugins without the need for them to understand details of the core of ASPECT. Rather, if the core changes, the SimulatorAccess class can still provide exactly the same interface. Thus, it insulates plugins from having to know the core. Equally importantly, since SimulatorAccess only offers its information in a read-only way it insulates the core from plugins since they can not interfere in the workings of the core except through the interface they themselves provide to the core.

Using this class, if a plugin class MyPostprocess is then not only derived from the corresponding Interface class but also from the SimulatorAccess class (as indeed most plugins are, see the dashed arrows in Fig. 240), then you can write a member function of the following kind (a nonsensical but instructive example; see Postprocessors: Evaluating the solution after each time step for more details on what postprocessors do and how they are implemented):[3]

template <int dim>
    MyPostprocessor<dim>::execute (TableHandler &statistics)
      // compute the mean value of vector component 'dim' of the solution
      // (which here is the pressure block) using a deal.II function:
      const double
        average_pressure = VectorTools::compute_mean_value (this->get_mapping(),
      statistics.add_value ("Average pressure", average_pressure);

      // return that there is nothing to print to screen (a useful
      // plugin would produce something more elaborate here):
      return std::pair<std::string,std::string>();

The second piece of information that plugins can use is called “introspection.” In the code snippet above, we had to use that the pressure variable is at position dim. This kind of implicit knowledge is usually bad style: it is error prone because one can easily forget where each component is located; and it is an obstacle to the extensibility of a code if this kind of knowledge is scattered all across the code base.

Introspection is a way out of this dilemma. Using the SimulatorAccess::introspection() function returns a reference to an object (of type aspect::Introspection) that plugins can use to learn about these sort of conventions. For example, this->introspection().component_mask.pressure returns a component mask (a deal.II concept that describes a list of booleans for each component in a finite element that are true if a component is part of a variable we would like to select and false otherwise) that describes which component of the finite element corresponds to the pressure. The variable, dim, we need above to indicate that we want the pressure component can be accessed as this->introspection().component_indices.pressure. While this is certainly not shorter than just writing dim, it may in fact be easier to remember. It is most definitely less prone to errors and makes it simpler to extend the code in the future because we don’t litter the sources with “magic constants” like the one above.

This aspect::Introspection class has a significant number of variables that can be used in this way, i.e., they provide symbolic names for things one frequently has to do and that would otherwise require implicit knowledge of things such as the order of variables, etc.