```{tags}
category:benchmark
feature:2d
feature:cartesian
feature:community-benchmark
feature:data-integration
```

(sec:benchmarks:yamauchi_takei_2016_anelasticity)=
# Yamauchi & Takei anelastic shear wave velocity-temperature conversion benchmark

*This section was contributed by Fred Richards.*

This benchmark tests the implementation of the anelastic shear wave
velocity-to-temperature conversion derived by {cite:t}`yamauchi:takei:2016`
based on forced-oscillation experiments conducted at seismic
frequencies on polycrystalline borneol. This anelasticity parameterization has
been calibrated against a range of observational constraints on upper mantle
temperature, attenuation and viscosity structure, using the surface wave
tomography model of {cite:t}`priestley:etal:2012` to constrain
shear wave velocity ($V_S$) and the plate model of {cite:t}`mckenzie:etal:2005`
to estimate lithospheric temperature structure. The resulting
$V_S$-to-temperature conversion accurately accounts for the strongly
non-linear temperature dependence of $V_S$ at near-solidus conditions and is
therefore especially useful for initializing models with accurate temperature
structure in the upper $\sim$ 400 km of the mantle. This benchmark is
located in the folder [benchmarks/yamauchi_takei_2016_anelasticity](https://www.github.com/geodynamics/aspect/blob/main/benchmarks/yamauchi_takei_2016_anelasticity).

```{figure-md} fig:anelasticity
<img src="YT16_benchmark.png" />

 V_S as a function of temperature in the oceanic lithosphere. Dotted lines: digitized results from Fig. 20 of {cite:t}`yamauchi:takei:2016`; solid lines: results; red = 50 km; blue = 75 km. Temperatures are taken from the plate model of {cite:t}`mckenzie:etal:2005` and V_{S} from the surface wave tomography model of {cite:t}`priestley:etal:2012`.
```

The parameterization of {cite:t}`yamauchi:takei:2016`
defines $V_S$ as
```{math}
:label: eq:Vs
V_S = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\rho J_1}} \left( \frac{1+\sqrt{1+(J_2/J_1)^2}}{2}\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}} \simeq \frac{1}{\sqrt{\rho J_1}}
```
where $\rho$ is the density and $J_1$ and $J_2$ represent real
and imaginary components of the complex compliance, $J^*$, which is a quantity
describing the sinusoidal strain resulting from the application of a unit
sinusoidal stress. $J_1$ represents the strain amplitude in phase with the
driving stress, whilst the $J_2$ component is $\frac{\pi}{2}$ out of phase,
resulting in dissipation. Density is calculated using the expression
```{math}
:label: eq:density_P
\rho (P,T) = \rho_{0}  \left\{ 1 - \left[\alpha(T - T_0)\right] + \frac{P}{K} \right\}
```
where $\rho_{0} = 3291~\text{ kg m}^{-3}$ and
$\alpha = 3.59 \times 10^{-5}~\text{ K}^{-1}$ are the density and thermal
expansivity corresponding to $T_{0} = 873~\text{ K}$, $P$ = pressure and
$K = 115.2~\text{ GPa}$ is the bulk modulus. $J_1$ and $J_2$ are expressed as
```{math}
:label: eqn:compliance
\begin{aligned}
J_1(\tau_S^{\prime})= & J_U \left[ 1 + \frac{A_B[\tau_S^{\prime}]^{\alpha_B}}{\alpha_B} + \frac{\sqrt{2\pi}}{2} A_P~\sigma_P \left\{ 1-\text{erf}\left(\frac{\ln[\tau_P^{\prime}/\tau_S^{\prime}]}{\sqrt{2}\sigma_P}\right)\right\}\right] \\
J_2(\tau_S^{\prime}) = & J_U \frac{\pi}{2} \left[ A_B[\tau_S^{\prime}]^{\alpha_B} + A_P~\exp \left(-\frac{\ln^2[\tau_P^{\prime}/\tau_S^{\prime}]}{2\sigma_P^2}\right)\right] + J_U \tau_S^{\prime}
\end{aligned}
```
where $A_B = 0.664$ and
$\alpha_B = 0.38$ represent the amplitude and slope of background stress
relaxation and $J_U$ is the unrelaxed compliance. Parameters $A_P$ and
$\sigma_P$ represent the amplitude and width of a high frequency relaxation
peak superimposed on this background trend such that
```{math}
A_P(T^{\prime}) = \begin{cases}
0.01  &  \text{for }T^{\prime} < 0.91 \\
0.01+0.4(T^{\prime}-0.91) & \text{for }0.91\leq T^{\prime} < 0.96 \\
0.03 & \text{for }0.96\leq T^{\prime} < 1 \\
0.03+\beta(\phi_m) & \text{for }T^{\prime} \geq 1 \\
\end{cases}
```
and
```{math}
\sigma_P(T^{\prime}) = \begin{cases}
4  &  \text{for }T^{\prime} < 0.92 \\
4+37.5(T^{\prime}-0.92) & \text{for }0.92\leq T^{\prime} < 1 \\
7& \text{for } T^{\prime} \geq 1 \\
\end{cases}
```
where $T^{\prime}$ is the homologous temperature
($\frac{T}{T_{s}}$) with $T$ the temperature and $T_s$ the solidus
temperature, both in Kelvin. $\phi_m$ is the melt fraction and $\beta(\phi_m)$
describes the direct poroelastic effect of melt (assumed to be negligible
under upper mantle conditions). For this case, $J_U$ is the inverse of the
unrelaxed shear modulus, $\mu_{U}(P,T)$, such that
```{math}
J_{U}(P,T)^{-1} = \mu_U(P,T) = \mu_U^0 + \frac{\partial{\mu_U}}{\partial{T}}(T -T_0)+ \frac{\partial{\mu_U}}{\partial{P}}(P-P_0)
```
where $\mu_U^0$ is the unrelaxed shear modulus at surface pressure-temperature
conditions, the differential terms are assumed to be constant and the
pressure, $P$, in GPa is linearly related to the depth, $z$, in km by
$\frac{z}{30}$. The normalized shear wave period, $\tau_S^{\prime}$, in
{math:numref}`eqn:compliance` is equal to $\frac{\tau_S}{2\pi\tau_M}$,
where $\tau_S = 100~\text{ s}$ is the shear wave period and
$\tau_M = \frac{\eta}{\mu_U}$ is the normalized Maxwell relaxation timescale.
$\tau_P^{\prime}$ represents the normalized shear-wave period associated with
the center of the high frequency relaxation peak, assumed to be
$6 \times 10^{-5}$. The shear viscosity, $\eta$, is
```{math}
:label: eq:eta
\eta = \eta_r \left(\frac{d}{d_r}\right)^{m} \exp \left[ \frac{E_a}{R}\left(\frac{1}{T}-\frac{1}{T_r}\right) \right] \exp \left[ \frac{V_a}{R}\left(\frac{P}{T}-\frac{P_r}{T_r}\right) \right] A_{\eta}
```
where $d$ is the grain size, $m$ the grain size exponent
(assumed to be 3), $R$ the gas constant, $E_a$ the activation energy and $V_a$
the activation volume. Subscripts $[X]_r$ refer to reference values, assumed
to be $d_r = d = 1~\text{ mm}$, $P_r = 1.5~\text{ GPa}$ and $T_r = 1473~\text{ K}$ for
the upper mantle. $A_{\eta}$ represents the extra reduction of viscosity due
to an increase in $E_a$ near the solidus, expressed as
```{math}
A_\eta(T^{\prime}) =
\begin{cases}
1  & \text{for } T^{\prime} < T^{\prime}_{\eta} \\
\exp \left[-\frac{(T^{\prime}-T^{\prime}_{\eta})}{(T^{\prime}-T^{\prime}T^{\prime}_{\eta})} \ln(\gamma)\right]& \text{for }T^{\prime}_{\eta} \leq T^{\prime} < 1 \\
\gamma^{-1} \exp(\lambda\phi) & \text{for }T^{\prime} \geq 1\\
\end{cases}
```
where $T^{\prime}_\eta$ is the homologous temperature above
which activation energy becomes $E_a + \Delta E_a$, and $\gamma = 5$ is the
factor of additional reduction. $\lambda\phi$ describes the direct effect of
melt on viscosity, assumed to be negligible here. The solidus temperature,
$T_s$, is fixed to a value of 1599&nbsp;K at 50&nbsp;km equivalent to a dry
peridotite solidus {cite}`hirschmann:2000` and linearly increases below this depth
according to
```{math}
:label: eq:Ts
T_{s}(z) = 1599 + \frac {\partial T_s}{\partial z} (z - 50000)
```
where $\frac {\partial T_s}{\partial z}$ is the solidus
gradient.

In this benchmark, a 2D input ASCII file containing $V_S$ specified at 50 and
75 km depth is read in and converted to temperature using an initial
temperature model that implements the $V_{S}(P,T)$ formulation detailed above.
The default parameters governing the relationship between $V_S$ and
temperature are set to the values calibrated by {cite:t}`yamauchi:takei:2016`, where $\mu_U^0 = 72.45~\text{ GPa}$,
$\frac{\partial{\mu_U}}{\partial{T}} = -0.01094~\text{ GPa K}^{-1}$,
$\frac{\partial{\mu_U}}{\partial{P}} = 1.987$,
$\eta_r = 6.22 \times 10^{21}~\text{ Pa s}$, $E_a = 452.5~\text{ kJ mol}^{-1}$,
$V_a = 7.913 \times 10^{-6}~\text{ m}^{3}~\text{ mol}^{-1}$ and
$\frac{\partial T_s}{\partial z} = 1.018~\text{ K km}^{-1}$. As $V_S$ is a
complex function of temperature, a Brent minimization algorithm is used to
find optimal values. {numref}`fig:anelasticity` shows that the implementation of this
parameterization can accurately recreate the results shown by
{cite:t}`yamauchi:takei:2016` in their Fig. 20.

The parameter file and initial temperature model for this benchmark can be
found at
[benchmarks/yamauchi_takei_2016_anelasticity/yamauchi_takei_2016_anelasticity.prm](https://www.github.com/geodynamics/aspect/blob/main/benchmarks/yamauchi_takei_2016_anelasticity/yamauchi_takei_2016_anelasticity.prm)
and
[benchmarks/yamauchi_takei_2016_anelasticity/anelasticity_temperature.cc](https://www.github.com/geodynamics/aspect/blob/main/benchmarks/yamauchi_takei_2016_anelasticity/anelasticity_temperature.cc).
Code to recreate {numref}`fig:anelasticity` is provided in
[benchmarks/yamauchi_takei_2016_anelasticity/plot_output](https://www.github.com/geodynamics/aspect/blob/main/benchmarks/yamauchi_takei_2016_anelasticity/plot_output).